Norfolk Broads Community Forum Speakers Corner UK.


Norfolkbroads.com

Welcome to the Bulletin and Message Board for the East of England.
A Community Service from WWW.NORFOLKBROADS.COM.
"The East of England's Business Directory"

Forum

Thread - AngliaAfloat endorsed law breaking?

Return to: All forums, General Discussion

Reply to topic
Page: 1, 2

You're not logged in - to log in, click here. To register a forum account, click here. View our Terms of Use Policy.

NEW  You can now attach images to your posts. They will also be inserted into our gallery!

Posts are ordered from oldest to newest. Click here to change order.

Message
Just breezed through Anglia Afloat. Several pictures of speeding bling boats giving it some wellie across Breydon. And as we all know there is a speed limit on Breydon!! Sadly no one appears willing to uphold it. Be interesting should there be an accident, the authorities having not upheld their own regulations. Not the first time A A has featured pictures of speeding blingsters.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Those who pay the piper.......
The biggest advertisers ar the Bling boys.
You surely didn't believe that journals such as Angliaaflop depend on their revenue principally from their readers?
Haven't read it for some time now. Can get a pint and a half of Wherry for the cover price
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Rubbish. I was there (and took the photographs). There is no speed limit across Breydon - just a safe navigating speed as defined in the Collision Regs. Effectively this means that motor boats, should not travel at a speed that for example might roll a lowered mast on a sailing boat out of its crutch. As it happened, it was both High Water and raining - all the boats in the photographs had made a passage along the coast. There were no other boats seen anywhere on Breydon (and obviously at High Water none making passage between the Broads rivers.

There was absolutely nothing that could remotely be considered illegal or unsafe about these boats crossing Breydon in the manner illustrated. Given the mudbanks, wash from speeding boats has no real opportunity to cause any damage either.

I fear you have been ill advised.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
He's a killjoy that Jamie Campbell.
One goes to a degree of trouble to persuade quite a large section of the Power Squadron, that there really is a speed limit on Breydon, and JC goes and blows the gaff.
Of course - he is quite right. Breydon, although legally still governed by the Port authority is not legally part of the constituted Port.

Confusin aint it?

Anyway, that means the Port speed limit is not imposed. Shame, because one of the few things stopping the blingers from treating it as a race track, was the uneasy suspicion that they might get done.

What is true is that (limits notwithstanding), if speed and wash doesn't keep a low profile on Breydon, rigorous speed limits won't be long coming.

How do I know that ?

It is because I am psychic.

Still: they only publicised it by putting pics of boats planing on Breydon in Anglia Afloat.

It could have been much worse.

It might have made the press.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
See:
http://www.eastportuk.co.uk/admin/bylaws/HavenConfirmed.pdf
Page 5 Para 14
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Schedule 1 Para 2 would appear to give the limits referred to in the previous reference.
Unfortunately, my large scale map is in Norfolk and I am unable to check the grids given. However, logic dictates that as the Yare flows into Breydon, the line across the river must include Breydon Water within the Haven. Therefore Para 14 would appear to apply - must remember to reef well next time I cross Breydon in a blow, wouldn't want to risk a speeding ticket
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Page 15 of the document which Peter so kindly posted defines the Haven (and with it the area controlled by the 7 mph speed limit), as bounded by a notional line across the river Yare from Ordnance grid ref TG51873017808 - TG951959017859.

This would appear to correspond to a line drawn across the Yare from just downriver of the Bure junction, to bisect Cobham wharf on the South Bank.
It is surely no coincidence that this also corresponds to the position of the 'No Hire Craft beyond this point' notices.

All of which would indicate that Breydon is outside the Haven and thus not governed by any Haven speed limit.

So let's hope instead it might be governed by common sense.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
correct TH, I queried this with GYPA a few days ago and posted on the other side. The national Grid references in their bylaws make no sense, but the limit of "The Haven" to which the speed limit applies ends at the point you describe.

I feel there may have been some "constructive signage" erected (or clever removal of the derestriction signage) to try and suggest a limit which it appears does not exist.

I for one was under the impression that a speed limit came into effect with the 1997 bylaw update, but not the case.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
I should add that interstingly the GYPA refer to that line as being "The Boundary of the Broads".
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
On the topic of crossing Boundaries Navia, I must now admit to purchasing Anglia Afloat in order to satisfy my curiosity as to Peter Waller's complaint.(speeding - not the clinical one).

This time the boundary crossed was one of belief.

Jamie Campbell's piccies produced no such outrage, but six pages of the most shameless plugs for the suppliers and caterers to the farewell party for the departing Editor. stood out like a bad joke - even in and amongst all the other shameless plugs.

Who paid for the party eh?

Judging by the less than faintly justifiable cover price of £3.95 for this grotty glossy, I suspect we did.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
I refer the Honorable Marsupial to the post which I made earlier
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
I'm firmly in the pint and a half of wherry brigade. I'm just waiting for them to put it up to a fiver then I can get two pints!
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
I must bow to the superior knowledge of my elders and betters. Sorry, Anglia Afloat.
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Tree Hugger wrote:
amongst all the other shameless plugs.


Mr Hugger that's just not cricket. Not at all fair. Not a balanced view.

Only one of the contributors sails a shameless plug.


And as for those more keen to spend their pocket money on Wherry, you Norfolk Nogs need to travel more.

Something of which Wherry has no capability, particularly from tap to tankard.


Of course, that's just my definitively factual opinion.

Learned it from a couple of Abbots.


Good health...
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
I do like the tatse of wherry but question its virtues as a session beer. Just can't keep the sleeping bag in place ...
Tell a Friend Offensive? Unsuitable? Report this Comment Reply Reply with quote
Reply Page: 1, 2
View our Terms of Use Policy
Change to:

© Copyright NorfolkBroads.com 2006 - 2009, The East of England's Business Directory.


hosted by NorfolkBroads.com | designed by innershed